Is There Hope for the American Marriage?

If you’ve ever read something that felt like you were reading your own thoughts, you will understand how much I connected with the July 2 Time Magazine cover story, with the same title as this post—most of it anyway.

Writer Caitlin Flanagan explains how marriage has changed during the past 40 years, and how these changes are affecting American families today. As an example of our obsession with high-profile marriage disasters, she pokes a bit of fun at South Carolina governor Mark Sanford (with his too-much-information mistress emails) and Senator John Ensign of Nevada, who recently made a similar public confession, but was nice enough to leave God out of it, “which must have been a nice break for the Almighty,” she says.

Flanagan calls marriage “an increasingly fragile construct depending less and less on notions of sacrifice and obligation than on the ephemera of romance and happiness as defined by and for its adult principles.” While the two-parent family remains our cultural ideal, frequent bombardment by things like affairs, boredom or lack of commitment are changing its face. (For example, 39.7% of births are now to unmarried women, most of whom are uneducated with low incomes.)

Why does this matter, she asks? Because the collapse of marriage is causing more “measurable hardship and human misery in this country” than any other single cause. And, because it hurts children, reduces their mothers’ financial security, and devastates the underclass. It’s a “catastrophic approach to life,” argued against by the current President and last two Presidents.

As I’ve frequently written about in this blog, she asserts every outcome measured on the wellbeing of children is higher when children are from two-parent, intact families. They live longer, perform better in school, have lower rates of teen pregnancy, criminal behavior, and on and on. Flanagan even quotes an ardent feminist, who after researching, was loathe to admit, yes, a father is important to children, even when he is not important to their mother.

The effect of divorce is true regardless of the child’s race or the family’s income. David Blankenhorn, the president of the Institute for American Values, says, “Children have a primal need to know who they are, to love and be loved by the two people whose physical union brought them here. To lose that connection, that sense of identity, is to experience a wound that no child-support check or fancy school can ever heal.”

What about committed cohabitors? According to researchers, it’s possible to provide a similar level of stability for a child without marriage. Unfortunately, very few cohabitors actually remain committed. Once stress enters the picture, often in the form of a child, “the new mother starts to make wifelike demands on the man, and without the commitment of marriage, he is soon out the door.”

What’s odd, or at least interesting, is that Americans as a whole still say they value lasting marriage as the gold standard. Yet, they may actually hold standards that are impossibly high. Remember that touching moment on Inauguration Night with the Obamas dancing lovingly all night? Flanagan suggests part of the awe and wonder was in “the sight of a middle-aged man and woman still together, still in love.” “We want something like that for ourselves; we recognize that it is something of great worth, but we are increasingly less willing to put in the hard work and personal sacrifice to get there,” she says, adding, “A lasting marriage is the reward, usually, of hard work and self-sacrifice.”

What can be done? “It is time to come to terms with both our unrealistic expectations for a happy marriage and our equally unrealistic beliefs about the consequences of walking away from the families we build,” Flanagan says.

She asks if marriage is simply an institution designed to increase the pleasure of the adults who enter into it. (If so, forget it; life sometimes includes sickness and pain.) Or, is the purpose of marriage “to raise the next generation, to protect and teach it, to instill in it the habits of conduct and character that will ensure the generation’s own safe passage into adulthood?” After all, these are the children, who will be taking care of us when we’re old.

What do you think the purpose of marriage is? I have hope for the American marriage, do you?

Read the Time Magazine article in full:

2 responses to “Is There Hope for the American Marriage?

  1. Debra Schalbert

    I read your posting, again, and decided to act upon your last sentcnce.
    The kind of marriage that I exalt is one that is displayed by Osa Johnson and her husband. ” I married adventure” is one of her books that reveal the very depth of her marriage as well as the well balanced, strong, confident, commited woman know as his wife.
    Jesse Benton Fremont was a well educated,well balanced, confident, strong teenager when she met her future husband. She joined her future life’s work (she knew this) to the direction of her future husband and the history of their life’s work evolved to be seen in our history books. Her devotion to her husband and their life’s cause is remarkable. She was an incredible wife, but even if she would have remained single she would have been viewed as an exceptional individual.
    Also Daniel Boone’s wife can be mentioned, as well as various others.
    Marriage must be viewed as man and a woman joining together to achieve that which cannot be achieved thru committed partnership without commonality in purpose, direction and goals. I believe the failure to develop as strong individuals, failure to see ourselves as worthy to contibute to society, and shallow affections results in weak, selfish marriages. My research show the above mentioned women began life with a strong connection with their fathers. It shows their belief that they were loved, valued,
    offered a humanitarian focus outside themselves at an early age. They grew up in a secure environment with the stimulation to think, and to take risks. They knew they had a purpose in life. I am so thankful for the examples that have set for me as a woman. Glimpses of their lives, in the context of marriage or prior, is so encouraging to me in today’s life. I
    I have been divorced for 22 years. Will I ever marry again? I don’t know. I do know what I am looking for, and I know my purpose in that search. I would rather wait forever and never see it come about than settle for less.
    I apologize for the failure to italicize or underline the title of the mentioned book.
    PS I failed to furnish references for my work.
    Writing in this manner seems so informal. Right?
    I am suuuuuuccchhhh a sticler for references for non-fiction. How about you?
    Debra Schalbert

  2. Debra Schalbert

    Shakespeare’s Let me not to the marriage of true mind sonnet is worthy of discussing on the topic of marriage, don’t you think?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s